������������Ƶ

Rudolf Arnheim reminds us that “the blessings experienced in therapy can reach further: they can remind artists everywhere what the function of art has always been and will always be.” This insight reflects the core of my teaching philosophy: studio instruction is not only a site of technical training, but also a space where students can confront, understand, and transform their inner lives through visual form.

Drawing on the science of visual perception, I emphasize that perception is both a cognitive and affective process that underlies all image-making. The principles of visual perception offer students an analytical framework for evaluating visual work alongside their subjective responses, helping them articulate an individual visual language grounded in both perception and reflection. In this way, critique becomes not just assessment, but a structured method of inquiry into how and why images communicate.

A central premise of my pedagogy is that every student carries an inherent aesthetic potential, even when they begin with uncertainty or self-doubt. My role is to help students identify and strengthen their intrinsic capacities through focused training in technique, critical thinking, and creative risk-taking. As students progress, they often encounter psychological and emotional barriers—frustration, fear of failure, or lack of confidence. I approach these moments as pedagogical opportunities, using the students’ existing strengths and “intrinsic positive properties” to guide them toward resilience, agency, and deeper engagement with their work.

Accessibility and mentorship are integral to this approach. I maintain open channels of communication through regular office hours, scheduled appointments, responsive email and phone contact, and, when appropriate, visits to my studio to discuss works in progress. These practices foster an atmosphere of trust and accountability, which in turn supports higher levels of rigor, experimentation, and independence in student work.

My teaching is highly individualized. I design critiques, assignments, and feedback to respond to each student’s evolving needs, creative processes, and personal histories, rather than directing them toward my own stylistic or perceptual preferences. The goal is not to produce replicas of the instructor, but to sharpen students’ awareness of their own aesthetic values and equip them with the skills to pursue these with clarity and confidence. Ultimately, I understand art education as a process of uncovering strengths, healing what is improvable, and cultivating independent, self-motivated artists who can sustain a meaningful practice beyond the classroom.

For me, teaching is itself an art form—demanding intellectual rigor, emotional presence, empathy, and persistence. It is challenging, transformative work that continually reshapes my own studio practice and professional life. I regard the opportunity to participate in students’ artistic and personal growth as a profound privilege, one that requires humility, ethical responsibility, and sustained commitment.